MENA GRC Community
Sign in

Integrated GRC Readiness Assessment

Twelve short statements across the four conditions of a coherent decision. Rate each one, then get a per-condition score with practical next steps.

  • 1 = Not in place
  • 2 = Limited
  • 3 = Partly established
  • 4 = Mostly established
  • 5 = Fully embedded

Consistent & shared information

Risk, control, audit and compliance data come from a single agreed source.

Decision-makers can see the same evidence we see, without asking us for it.

Definitions (risk appetite, severity, materiality) mean the same thing across functions.

Connected roles with clear RACI

Every recurring governance decision has a named accountable owner.

Risk, compliance, audit, legal and IT know when they are consulted versus informed.

We rarely duplicate assessments or requests across assurance functions.

Collaborative decisions & execution

GRC inputs are combined into one view rather than several separate reports.

Business owners treat GRC as a partner in execution, not a reviewer at the end.

Agreed actions are tracked to closure with visible ownership.

Coordinated timing

GRC input arrives early enough to change the outcome of a decision.

Our assurance calendar is aligned with planning, budgeting and project gates.

Escalation of an emerging issue reaches the right forum within days, not months.

This tool is for members

Sign in or join free to see your results and receive a copy by email.

Sign in / Join

Our content is practitioner-led and reviewed by members of the Expert Panel Decision Committee before publication. Views expressed by individual contributors remain their own.

Content published by MENA GRC Community is provided for professional learning and discussion. It should not be treated as legal, regulatory, audit or organization-specific advice.